Editorial Policy — Space9

Space9.bet is independent from Space9 Casino. The operator does not review the articles before publication, cannot pay to change a sentence and cannot block a critical mention. We disclose that this site earns referral commission when a reader opens an account with Space9 after clicking through — this is visible on every page where a bonus is listed. Commission does not change the editorial verdict: if a bonus has a 50x wagering requirement the article says so, regardless of whether a sign-up pays us or not.

Every number in every article is checked against a public source. Bonus amounts, free spin counts and wagering multipliers are checked against the operator's own promo page on the day of publication, and re-checked at least once per quarter. Payment method lists are checked against the operator's cashier. When a source disappears (for example when a promo ends) the editor replaces the number with the current version or marks the article as under review until the replacement is confirmed.

When an article cites a third party — a game studio, a payment processor, a regulator — we link directly to the source. If a claim appears in several places (for example a wagering requirement that is quoted both on the bonus page and in the T&Cs) we use the T&Cs because they are legally binding and tend to be the last version updated. Corrections are visible: if we change a published article, a short note at the bottom of the page records what moved and when, so returning readers do not have to guess whether the article they remember has been touched.

Three principles sit above everything else we do. Be useful: the reader opened the page with a question and must leave with an answer. Be accurate: a claim either has a source or it does not get published. Be fair: the Space9 Casino product has strong sides and weak sides, and we describe both. Every writer on the team is reminded of these three on their first day and every editor is expected to hold the team to them.